The Red Thread Files ◀ All entries Open the case room
Scientists & Researchers

Avi Loeb

2026

Harvard theoretical astrophysicist known for arguing that interstellar objects like 'Oumuamua may be technological artifacts; wrote that the June 2026 third PURSUE release was "the most intriguing yet." Asked by an ODNI official visiting his home in June 2026 to assemble and chair a new "UAP Science Advisory Council" tasked by the White House, AARO, ODNI, the FBI, and the Intelligence Community. Previously served on Trump's first-term President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2019-2020); founder of the Galileo Project and bestselling author of "Extraterrestrial."

Explore Avi Loeb in the live connections board → Open the case file

Connections (7)

confirmedBeatriz Villarroel
fellow academic pursuing anomalous-astronomy/technosignatures; her vanishing-transients work parallels the Galileo Project's aims
confirmedVon Neumann Probe (UAP hypothesis)
he has publicly advanced the hypothesis that UAP / interstellar objects could be such probes
Source: Loeb / Galileo Project; UAP-probe commentary
confirmedSean Kirkpatrick
co-authored a March 2023 manuscript on physical constraints for hypothetical alien spacecraft
Source: Loeb & Kirkpatrick manuscript (Mar 7, 2023)
confirmedJon Kosloski
his June 2026 AARO report cited by Loeb's council
confirmedPURSUE
wrote that its June 2026 third release was "the most intriguing yet"
Source: PURSUE program releases and press coverage (2026)
confirmedUAP Science Advisory Council
founded and chairs
Source: UAP Science Advisory Council public roster; Avi Loeb / Galileo Project announcements (2025-26)
confirmedODNI
visited at home by ODNI official who requested council formation
Source: UAP Science Advisory Council public roster; Avi Loeb / Galileo Project announcements (2025-26)
Part of The Red Thread Files — an independent, evidence-first investigation into the UAP, USO, and consciousness question. Confidence labels (confirmed / reported / disputed) are an automated approximation based on the wording and directness of each source, not a verdict. Corrections: sddgfeedback@gmail.com.