USAF Roswell Report (1994-97)
The 1994-1997 USAF investigation ('The Roswell Report: Fact vs. Fiction' and 'Case Closed') concluding the debris was a Project Mogul balloon train; its witness basis rested heavily on Cavitt's 1994 sworn statement.
In the UAP recordRuled into the unidentified-phenomena thread on 2 September 2026 from this entity's own name and role text, which contain: "roswell". An editorial classification of what thread this entity belongs to; it rests on no page and does not claim to. Neighbours were not used - see apply-subjects-2026-09-02.mjs for why.
3 of 3 connections resolve to a document you can open.
Documents3 behind these connections
Documents behind these connections
3 connections
-
Report of Air Force Research Regarding the "Roswell Incident" Report on the Historical Record of U.S. Government Involvement with Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), Volume IThis map saysprincipal author of the 1994 Air Force reportThe document saysRICHARD L. WEAVER, Col, USAF, Director, Security and Special Program Oversight - signature block on the 27 Jul 1994 cover memorandum at printed 5 and on the conclusion at printed 31.Report of Air Force Research Regarding the "Roswell Incident", 1994
printed p. 5 · read off the page footers
read as an image — the grade this project quotes from: the page was rendered and the picture read -
This map saysconcluded the debris was a Project Mogul balloon trainThe document saysThe Air Force research did not locate or develop any information that the "Roswell Incident" was a UFO event. All available official materials, although they do not directly address Roswell per se, indicate that the most likely source of the wreckage recovered from the Brazel Ranch was from one of the Project MOGUL balloon trains.Report of Air Force Research Regarding the "Roswell Incident", 1994
printed p. 30 · read off the page footer
read as an image — the grade this project quotes from: the page was rendered and the picture readCaveat THIS LINK PREVIOUSLY CITED "The Roswell Report: Case Closed (1997)" - which is the wrong volume, and this project's own record for Case Closed says so in terms: "Nothing in this record may be cited for the Mogul explanation of the debris." The Mogul finding is here, in the 1994 report, and now cites it. Note also the conclusion's own hedge in the same sentence: the official materials "do not directly address Roswell per se". -
the 1994-97 Air Force reinvestigation of the incidentThe Roswell Report: Case Closedprinted p. iii · PDF p. 5 checked against the page
1 correction to this record
Generated from the record, not written by hand. Every change keeps what the map used to say, because a correction nobody can see is indistinguishable from never having been wrong.